4.0 Article

Late Quaternary Fossil Vertebrates of the Broken River Karst Area, Northern Queensland, Australia

Journal

RECORDS OF THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 193-206

Publisher

AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.72.2020.1723

Keywords

Quaternary; Pleistocene; mammal; marsupial; extinction; range shifts

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DE120101533, DP120101752]
  2. Australian Research Council [DE120101533] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two new fossil deposits from caves of the Broken River area, northeast Queensland. provide the first regional records of vertebrate species turnover and extinction through the late Quaternary. Fossil assemblages from Big Ho and Beehive Caves are dominated by small-bodied vertebrates, especially mammals. They represent owl roost deposits, although limited presence of larger-bodied taxa such as macropodids may be the result of occasional pitfall trapping. U-series dating demonstrates that Big Ho dates to the penultimate glacial cycle (c. 165 ka) and Beehive to the early Holocene (c. 8.5 ka). A total of 34 mammalian taxa were identified; within the two deposits, seven taxa arc unique to Big Ho and another seven are found only in Beehive. The deposits also preserve five extinct fossil taxa (bandicoots and rodents) that add to a growing list of small-bodied species known to have suffered extinction in the late Quaternary. The deposits further yield the remains of four species of bandicoots and rodents (Chaeropus yirratji, Notomys longicaudatus, Conilurus albipes, and Pseudomys gouldii) that suffered extinction post-European colonization. These new fossil records represent significant increases in the known geographic and temporal range of several species and begin to fill an important gap in our understanding of the faunal history of tropical northeast Australia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available