4.7 Article

Imaging of Pulmonary Hypertension in Adults: A Position Paper from the Fleischner Society

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 298, Issue 3, Pages 531-549

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020203108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Investissement d'Avenir program [ANR-18-RHUS-0006]
  2. MRC [G0701127, MR/M008894/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulmonary hypertension is a condition characterized by elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure, with radiologists playing a crucial role in its assessment and management. A working group was established to focus on the role of imaging techniques in diagnosing and managing PH, highlighting the importance of imaging in the recognition, work-up, treatment planning, and follow-up of PH.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mm Hg and classified into five different groups sharing similar pathophysiologic mechanisms, hemodynamic characteristics, and therapeutic management. Radiologists play a key role in the multidisciplinary assessment and management of PH. A working group was formed from within the Fleischner Society based on expertise in the imaging and/or management of patients with PH, as well as experience with methodologies of systematic reviews. The working group identified key questions focusing on the utility of CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine in the evaluation of PH: (a) Is noninvasive imaging capable of identifying PH? (b) What is the role of imaging in establishing the cause of PH? (c) How does imaging determine the severity and complications of PH? (d) How should imaging be used to assess chronic thromboembolic PH before treatment? (e) Should imaging be performed after treatment of PH? This systematic review and position paper highlights the key role of imaging in the recognition, work-up, treatment planning, and follow-up of PH. This article is a simultaneous joint publication in Radiology and European Respiratory Journal. The articles are identical except for stylistic changes in keeping with each journal's style. Either version may be used in citing this article. (C) 2021 RSNA and the European Respiratory Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available