4.7 Article

Holocene relative sea-level changes and coastal evolution along the coastlines of Kamaran Island and As-Salif Peninsula, Yemen, southern Red Sea

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106719

Keywords

Red sea; Mid-holocene sea level; Coastal geomorphology; Fossil corals; Wave-cut notches; U-series dating

Funding

  1. U.S Fulbright Association
  2. NSF [NSFC 41888101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geomorphic features from the southern Red Sea coasts provide valuable indicators of past sea-level change, with water loading being the primary factor influencing the spatial and temporal variability of the mid-Holocene highstand. Sea-level indicators from two locations on the As-Salif Peninsula suggest a mid-Holocene highstand of -0.5-1 m above present mean sea level.
Geomorphic features (fossil terraces, notches and sea cliffs) from the southern Red Sea coasts provide valuable indicators of past sea-level change that enable the quantification of both the timing and magnitude of the mid-Holocene sea-level highstand. We demonstrate the utility of wave-cut notches in the southern Red Sea, and present U-series dated sea-level indicators from two locations on the As-Salif Peninsula that suggest a mid-Holocene highstand of -0.5-1 m above present mean sea level (apmsl) at about 5-5.4 Ica BP. In addition, the similarity of the elevations of the different sea-level indicators at the two locations in As-Salif Peninsula and Kamran Island suggest relative tectonic stability, with limited influence of salt diapirism. Comparison of our data to other estimates of the Red Sea mid-Holocene highstand, and glacio-isostatic predictions suggest that water loading (and deformational response) is the primary factor in the spatial and temporal variability the mid-Holocene highstand, with some possible localized tectonic and neotectonic overprinting. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available