4.6 Article

Cardiac sympathetic activity during recovery as an indicator of sympathetic activity during task performance

Journal

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13724

Keywords

post‐ task recovery; pre‐ ejection period; RB interval; RZ interval; sympathetic cardiac activity

Funding

  1. Widespread Disaster Simulator-research and preparation for implementation (the Smart Growth Operational Programme, sub-measure 1.1.1. Industrial research and development work implemented by enterprises)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research found that sympathetic recovery from a task was rapid, with cardiovascular recovery occurring within the first 30 seconds of the recovery period. Additionally, residual cardiac activity during the recovery period had predictive power for task-related cardiac activity, suggesting its usefulness as an indicator.
The goals of this research were to analyze cardiac sympathetic recovery patterns and evaluate whether sympathetic cardiac responses to a task challenge can be predicted using residual cardiac activity measured directly after the task (that is, during the recovery period). In two studies (total N = 181), we measured cardiac sympathetic activity, quantified as pre-ejection period and RB interval, during both task performance and the 2-min recovery period following the task. Additional analyses examined effects on the RZ interval. We found that sympathetic recovery from a task was rather quick: Cardiovascular recovery occurred within the first 30 s of the recovery period. Nevertheless, residual cardiac activity during the recovery period had predictive power for task-related cardiac activity. This suggests that sympathetic cardiac activity during recovery may serve as a useful indicator of task-related cardiac sympathetic activity. We discuss the implications of these findings for practical applications and the design of future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available