4.3 Article

Human SARS CoV-2 spike protein mutations

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages 569-576

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.26042

Keywords

mutations; receptor binding domain; SARS-CoV-2; sequence and structural mapping; spike proteins

Funding

  1. School of Chemistry, University of Hyderabad

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analyzing spike protein sequences from different regions globally, this study found that out of 10333 sequences, 8155 proteins had mutations. A total of 9654 mutations were observed, with 44 mutations in the RBD region.
The human spike protein sequences from Asia, Africa, Europe, North America, South America, and Oceania were analyzed by comparing with the reference severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) protein sequence from Wuhan-Hu-1, China. Out of 10333 spike protein sequences analyzed, 8155 proteins comprised one or more mutations. A total of 9654 mutations were observed that correspond to 400 distinct mutation sites. The receptor binding domain (RBD) which is involved in the interactions with human angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) receptor and causes infection leading to the COVID-19 disease comprised 44 mutations that included residues within 3.2 angstrom interacting distance from the ACE-2 receptor. The mutations observed in the spike proteins are discussed in the context of their distribution according to the geographical locations, mutation sites, mutation types, distribution of the number of mutations at the mutation sites and mutations at the glycosylation sites. The density of mutations in different regions of the spike protein sequence and location of the mutations in protein three-dimensional structure corresponding to the RBD are discussed. The mutations identified in the present work are important considerations for antibody, vaccine, and drug development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available