4.7 Article

Evolution of honest reward signal in flowers

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2848

Keywords

rewardless flower; pollinator attractivity; free riders; plant-animal interaction; foraging behaviour; signalling theory

Funding

  1. JSPS [201960610, 19K21198, 13J00371]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13J00371] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some flowering plants change their flower traits to signal the abundance of rewards for pollinators. It has been found that honest signals are evolutionarily stable only when flowers are visited by pollinators with both high and low learning abilities.
Some flowering plants signal the abundance of their rewards by changing their flower colour, scent or other floral traits as rewards are depleted. These floral trait changes can be regarded as honest signals of reward states for pollinators. Previous studies have hypothesized that these signals are used to maintain plant-level attractiveness to pollinators, but the evolutionary conditions leading to the development of honest signals have not been well investigated from a theoretical basis. We examined conditions leading to the evolution of honest reward signals in flowers by applying a theoretical model that included pollinator response and signal accuracy. We assumed that pollinators learn floral traits and plant locations in association with reward states and use this information to decide which flowers to visit. While manipulating the level of associative learning, we investigated optimal flower longevity, the proportion of reward and rewardless flowers, and honest- and dishonest-signalling strategies. We found that honest signals are evolutionarily stable only when flowers are visited by pollinators with both high and low learning abilities. These findings imply that behavioural variation in learning within a pollinator community can lead to the evolution of an honest signal even when there is no contribution of rewardless flowers to pollinator attractiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available