4.7 Article

Anomalous invasion dynamics due to dispersal polymorphism and dispersal-reproduction trade-offs

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2825

Keywords

invasion; dispersal; evolution; trade-off; population dynamics; mathematical model

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC ACCE DTP) [NE/L002450/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mathematical model shows that unexpected invasion dynamics can emerge from the combination of dispersal polymorphism, dispersal-fitness trade-offs, and mutation between strains. The trade-off relationship between dispersal and population growth rates of the constituent strains determines invasion dynamics. The ultimate invasion speed is determined by the traits of at most two strains, highlighting the importance of these factors in ecological, evolutionary, or epidemiological invasions.
Dispersal polymorphism and mutation play significant roles during biological invasions, potentially leading to evolution and complex behaviour such as accelerating or decelerating invasion fronts. However, life-history theory predicts that reproductive fitness-another key determinant of invasion dynamics-may be lower for more dispersive strains. Here, we use a mathematical model to show that unexpected invasion dynamics emerge from the combination of heritable dispersal polymorphism, dispersal-fitness trade-offs, and mutation between strains. We show that the invasion dynamics are determined by the trade-off relationship between dispersal and population growth rates of the constituent strains. We find that invasion dynamics can be 'anomalous' (i.e. faster than any of the strains in isolation), but that the ultimate invasion speed is determined by the traits of, at most, two strains. The model is simple but generic, so we expect the predictions to apply to a wide range of ecological, evolutionary, or epidemiological invasions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available