4.7 Article

Research Note: Simultaneous detection of infectious laryngotracheitis virus, fowlpox virus, and reticuloendotheliosis virus in chicken specimens

Journal

POULTRY SCIENCE
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.01.009

Keywords

infectious laryngotracheitis virus; fowl pox virus; fowl pox virus integrated; reticuloendotheliosis virus; multiplex PCR

Funding

  1. Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, the Republic of Korea [B-1543084-2019-20-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of ILTV, FWPV, REV-integrated FWPV, and REV, with a sensitivity of 1 x 54 copies/tube. The multiplex PCR showed 100% agreement with singleplex PCRs and sequencing when testing clinical samples, providing a simple, rapid, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective method for detecting the 4 viruses in clinical specimens.
Infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT), fowlpox (FP), and reticuloendotheliosis are important poultry diseases caused by gallid herpesvirus 1 (ILTV), fowlpox virus (FWPV), and reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV), respectively. Coinfections with ILTV and FWPV occur naturally in chickens, and FP in its more virulent wet form is characterized by diphtheritic lesions and easily confused with ILT. Moreover, the insertion of only partial REV-LTR or a nearly full-length REV into the FWPV genome, located between the ORF 201 and ORF 203, has increased recently in wild-type field FWPV isolates. Therefore, it is critical to detect ILTV, FWPV, REV-integrated FWPV, and REV early and accurately. In this study, we successfully developed a multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of ILTV, FWPV, REV-integrated FWPV, and REV, and the detection limits was 1 x 54 copies/tube. When used to test clinical samples, the results of the multiplex PCR were in 100% agreement with singleplex PCRs and sequencing. This new multiplex PCR is a simple, rapid, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective method for detection of 4 viruses in clinical specimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available