4.7 Article

Discrimination of common defects in loquat fruit cv. 'Algerie' using hyperspectral imaging and machine learning techniques

Journal

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111356

Keywords

Eriobotrya japonica; Quality; Non-destructive; Artificial vision; Classification; Multivariate analysis

Funding

  1. FEDER funds [RTA2015-00078-00-00, P1D2019-107347RR-C31, P1D2019-107347RR-C32, PID2019-107347RR-C33]
  2. INIA for the FPI-INIA [43 (CPR2014-0082)]
  3. European Union FSE funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loquat fruit is economically important in certain regions of Spain, but is prone to mechanical damage and physiological disorders. Hyperspectral imaging using VIS and NIR was successful in distinguishing between external and internal defects in loquat cv. 'Algerie', with the XGBoost classifier outperforming the RF classifier with success rates ranging from 95.9% to 97.5% in different classification approaches.
Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica L.) is an important fruit for the economy of some regions of Spain that is very susceptible to mechanical damage and physiological disorders. These problems depreciate its value and prevent it from being exported. Visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) hyperspectral imaging was used to discriminate between external and internal common defects of loquat cv. 'Algerie'. Two classifiers, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boost (XGBoost), and different spectral pre-processing techniques were evaluated in terms of their capacity to distinguish between sound and defective features according to three approaches. In the first approach the fruit pixels were classified into two classes, sound or defect, with a 97.5% rate of success; in the second the defective features were considered internal or external defects, achieving a 96.7% rate of success; and in the third approach each type of defect, i.e. purple spot, bruising, scars and flesh browning, were considered separately with a correct classification rate of 95.9%. The results indicated that the XGBoost classifier was the best method in all cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available