4.7 Article

New evaluation method for the curing degree of rubber and its nanocomposites using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy

Journal

POLYMER TESTING
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106993

Keywords

Attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy; Triallyl isocyanurate; Crosslinking reaction; Fluorine rubber; Nanocomposite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A nondestructive method using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was proposed to evaluate the curing degree of cured rubbers and their nanocomposites, specifically in fluorine-based rubber. The study found that the FWHM of the C=O band can be used as a standard to measure the crosslinking density, showing good applicability in the presence of various nanofillers. Additionally, the study revealed that FWHM was more sensitive to changes in crosslinking density when fillers like CNTs were added to the rubber compared to changes in Young's modulus.
A nondestructive method of evaluating the curing degree (crosslinking density) of cured rubbers and their nanocomposites based on attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy was proposed and applied to fluorine-based rubber (FKM), in which triallyl-isocyanurate (TAIC) was employed as a curing agent. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy demonstrated that the C=O band in TAIC at 1699 cm(-1) decreased in intensity and broadened as the curing reaction progressed. A calibration model relating the crosslinking density in the FKM with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the band of the C=O bond was developed. The model showed good applicability to both FKM and FKM nanocomposites with various nanofillers, including single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon black and silica particles. Interestingly, when the fillers, especially CNTs, were added to the rubber, the FWHM was more sensitive to the change in the crosslinking density than the change in the Young's modulus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available