4.5 Article

HPLC-UV, Metabarcoding and Genome Skims of Botanical Dietary Supplements: A Case Study in Echinacea

Journal

PLANTA MEDICA
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages 314-324

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1336-1685

Keywords

next-generation sequencing (NGS); genome skimming; botanical dietary supplements; Asteraceae

Funding

  1. University of Maryland Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
  2. FDA [FDU001418]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. U.S. FDA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of DNA-based methods for authentication of botanical dietary supplements has sparked vigorous debate, with comparisons to chemical methods and discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Genome skimming has shown enhanced discriminatory capacity compared to traditional DNA barcoding methods, particularly in identifying closely related species within the Echinacea genus.
The use of DNA-based methods to authenticate botanical dietary supplements has been vigorously debated for a variety of reasons. More comparisons of DNA-based and chemical methods are needed, and concordant evaluation of orthogonal approaches on the same products will provide data to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches. The overall application of DNA-based methods is already firmly integrated into a wide array of continually modernizing stand alone and complementary authentication protocols. Recently, the use of full-length chloroplast genome sequences provided enhanced discriminatory capacity for closely related species of Echinacea compared to traditional DNA barcoding approaches (matK and rbcL). Here, two nextgeneration sequencing approaches were used: (1) genome skimming and (2) PCR amplicon (metabarcoding). The two genetic approaches were then combined with HPLC-UV to evaluate 20 commercially available dietary supplements of Echinacea representing finished products. The trade-offs involved in different DNA approaches were discussed, with a focus on how DNA methods support existing, accepted chemical methods. In most of the products (19/20), HPLC-UV suggested the presence of Echinacea spp. While metabarcoding was not useful with this genus and instead only resolved 7 products to the family level, genome skimming was able to resolve to species (9) or genus (1) with the 10/20 products where it was successful. Additional ingredients that HPLC-UV was unable to identify were also found in four products along with the relative sequence proportion of the constituents. Additionally, genome skimming was able to identify one product that was a different Echinacea species entirely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available