4.7 Article

Predicting plant available water holding capacity of soils from crop yield

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 459, Issue 1-2, Pages 315-328

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-020-04757-0

Keywords

Process-based soil-plant modelling; Inverse modelling; Wheat yield; Empirical model; APSIM

Funding

  1. Digiscape Future Science Platform (FSP) of CSIRO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a general inverse approach to reliably predict soil PAWC from crop yield, demonstrating higher accuracy in regions with high rainfall or dominant summer rainfall.
Aims Quantification of variations in plant available water holding capacity (PAWC) of soils helps to improve yield forecast and inform spatially variable management practices in dryland agriculture systems. We developed and tested a general inverse approach to estimate PAWC from crop yield. Methods The APSIM model was used to simulate wheat yield on synthetic soils with contrasting PAWC and climates. The simulated results were used to develop an empirical model to relate simulated yield to PAWC. The empirical model was inversely used to predict PAWC from observed crop yield. Potential prediction ability was quantified using independently simulated wheat yield on actual soils. The actual ability was assessed with measured wheat yields and PAWC. Results The approach had higher accuracy for sites with high rainfall or dominant summer rainfall. It could potentially provide acceptable PAWC predictions across contrasting climate regions (prediction error < 37 mm, 33.5%). The prediction error using crop yield against measured PAWC was <25 mm (26.5%). Conclusions Our results demonstrate that soil PAWC can be reliably predicted from crop yield. This approach provides an alternative way to predict PAWC rather than directly measuring it via soil sampling, with profound implications for reducing labour and costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available