4.5 Article

Positive end-expiratory pressure titration with electrical impedance tomography and pressure-volume curve: a randomized trial in moderate to severe ARDS

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/abd679

Keywords

acute respiratory distress syndrome; electrical impedance tomography; titration of positive end-expiratory pressure; pressure– volume curve; lung protective ventilation strategy

Funding

  1. Far Eastern Memorial Hospital [FEMH-2018-C-077, FEMH-2019-C-071]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 51837011]
  3. BMBF MOVE [FKZ 13FH628IX6]
  4. Everest Program of AFMU [2019ZFB002]
  5. H2020 MCSA Rise [872488- DCPM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to compare PEEP titration using EIT and PV curve in moderate to severe ARDS patients. Results showed that PEEP guided by EIT may lead to improved driving pressure and survival rate in this patient population.
Objective. The aim of the study was to compare titration of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and with ventilator-embedded pressure-volume (PV) loop in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Approach. Eighty-seven moderate to severe ARDS patients (arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio, PaO2/FiO(2) <= 200 mmHg) were randomized to either EIT group (n = 42) or PV group (n = 45). All patients received identical medical care using the same general support guidelines and protective mechanical ventilation. In the EIT group, the selected PEEP equaled the airway pressure at the intercept between cumulated collapse and overdistension percentages curves and in the PV group, at the pressure where maximal hysteresis was reached. Main results. Baseline characteristics and settings were comparable between the groups. After optimization, PEEP was significantly higher in the PV group (17.4 1.7 versus 16.2 2.6 cmH(2)O, PV versus EIT groups, p = 0.02). After 48 h, driving pressure was significantly higher in the PV group (12.4 3.6 versus 10.9 2.5 cmH(2)O, p = 0.04). Lung mechanics and oxygenation were better in the EIT group but did not statistically differ between the groups. The survival rate was lower in the PV group (44.4% versus 69.0%, p = 0.02; hazard ratio 2.1, confidence interval 11-3.9). None of the other pre-specified exploratory clinical endpoints were significantly different. Significance. In moderate to severe ARDS, PEEP titration guided with EIT, compared with PV curve, might be associated with improved driving pressure and survival rate. Trial registration: NCT03112512, 13 April, 2017.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available