4.4 Article

Nonlinear bubble competition of the multimode ablative Rayleigh-Taylor instability and applications to inertial confinement fusion

Journal

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0023541

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE FES Grant [DE-SC0014318, DE-SC0020229]
  2. U.S. NASA [80NSSC18K0772]
  3. U.S. NNSA Award [DE-NA0003856, DE-NA0003914]
  4. U.S. DOE [DE-SC0019329]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11975056]
  6. Science Challenge Project (SCP) [TZ2016005]
  7. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA25050400]
  8. NSFC [11772324, 11621202]
  9. SCP [TZ2016001]
  10. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  11. agency of the U.S. Government
  12. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020229, DE-SC0019329] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The self-similar nonlinear evolution of the multimode ablative Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI) and the ablation-generated vorticity effect are studied for a range of initial conditions. We show that, unlike classical RTI, the nonlinear multimode bubble-front evolution remains in the bubble competition regime due to ablation-generated vorticity, which accelerates the bubbles, thereby preventing a transition into the bubble-merger regime. We develop an analytical bubble competition model to describe the linear and nonlinear stages of ablative RTI. We show that vorticity inside the multimode bubbles is most significant at small scales with large initial perturbation. Since these small scales persist in the bubble competition regime, the self-similar growth coefficient alpha (b) can be enhanced by up to 30% relative to ablative bubble competition without vorticity effects. We use the ablative bubble competition model to explain the hydrodynamic stability boundary observed in OMEGA low-adiabat implosion experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available