4.4 Article

Optical Properties of ZnO Deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition on Sapphire: A Comparison of Thin and Thick Films

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.202000669

Keywords

atomic layer deposition; photoluminescence; thin films; ultraviolet– visible light spectroscopy; zinc oxide

Funding

  1. Polish NCN [DEC-2018/07/B/ST3/03576]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The optical properties of thin ZnO films grown by atomic layer deposition on sapphire substrates are influenced by growth temperature, film thickness, and post-growth annealing. While the energy gap decreases with increasing growth temperature, post-growth annealing leads to an increase in the energy gap and a decrease in Urbach energy. Thicker and annealed samples exhibit more intense and narrower photoluminescence bands, attributed to various exciton and transition processes.
Optical properties of thin (approximate to 100 nm) ZnO films in comparison with thick (approximate to 1 mu m) layers deposited on sapphire substrates by atomic layer deposition (ALD) at temperatures from 100 to 300 degrees C are investigated by optical transmittance and luminescence. It is found that growth temperature, the thickness of the layers, and post-grown annealing influence the measured optical bandgap values and low-temperature photoluminescence. However, the values of the bandgaps corrected according to the Burstein-Moss effect do not depend on layer thickness, whereas an increase in growth temperature leads to a decrease in the energy gap. On the other hand, post-growth annealing of the layers results in increasing the value of the energy gap and decreasing Urbach energy. It is observed that thicker and annealed samples show more intensive and narrower PL bands, which are assigned to donor and acceptor bound excitons, free electrons to acceptors, and donor-acceptor pair transitions. Their energy position and relative intensity depend on the growth temperature applied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available