4.2 Article

A weighted log-rank test and associated effect estimator for cancer trials with delayed treatment effect

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 528-550

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pst.2092

Keywords

average hazard ratio; delayed treatment effect; immunotherapy; statistical power; weighted log-rank test

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR000445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposes new weighted log-rank tests to address delayed treatment effects in cancer vaccine or immunotherapy trials. By utilizing NESA for numerical evaluation, the proposed tests demonstrate better performance compared to existing methods, showing close to optimal results in simulations. The methods are further demonstrated in two cancer immunotherapy trials.
The standard log-rank test has been extended by adopting various weight functions. Cancer vaccine or immunotherapy trials have shown a delayed onset of effect for the experimental therapy. This is manifested as a delayed separation of the survival curves. This work proposes new weighted log-rank tests to account for such delay. The weight function is motivated by the time-varying hazard ratio between the experimental and the control therapies. We implement a numerical evaluation of the Schoenfeld approximation (NESA) for the mean of the test statistic. The NESA enables us to assess the power and to calculate the sample size for detecting such delayed treatment effect and also for a more general specification of the non-proportional hazards in a trial. We further show a connection between our proposed test and the weighted Cox regression. Then the average hazard ratio using the same weight is obtained as an estimand of the treatment effect. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to compare the performance of the proposed tests with the standard log-rank test and to assess their robustness to model mis-specifications. Our tests outperform the G(rho,gamma) class in general and have performance close to the optimal test. We demonstrate our methods on two cancer immunotherapy trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available