4.6 Article

Human milk oligosaccharides, infant growth, and adiposity over the first 4 months of lactation

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 684-693

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-020-01328-y

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Nestle Research, Societe des Produits Nestle, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a negative correlation between lacto-N-neotetraose and length change, and a positive correlation between sialyllacto-N-tetraose c and weight for length. However, the changes in HMO composition had little influence on infant growth and body composition in healthy mothers and infants.
Background: The relationship between human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and infant growth and adiposity is not fully understood and comprehensive studies are missing from the current literature. Methods: We screened and recruited 370 healthy, pregnant women and their infants from seven European countries. Breastmilk samples were collected using standardized procedures at six time points over 4 months, as were infant parameters. Correlations and associations between HMO area under the curve, anthropometric data, and fat mass at 4 months were tested. Results: Lacto-N-neotetraose had a negative correlation with the change in length (rs = -0.18, P = 0.02). Sialyllacto-N-tetraose c (LSTc) had a positive correlation with weight for length (rs = 0.19, P = 0.015). Infants at the 25th upper percentile were fed milk higher in 3 '-sialyllactose and LSTc (P = 0.017 and P = 0.006, respectively) compared to the lower 25th percentile of the weight-for-length z-score gain over 4 months of lactation. No significant associations between growth and body composition and Lewis or secretor-dependent HMOs like 2 '-fucosyllactose were identified. Conclusions: Changes in the HMO composition of breastmilk during the first 4 months appear to have little influence on infant growth and body composition in this cohort of healthy mothers and infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available