3.9 Article

Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia versus secondary organizing pneumonia

Journal

PATHOLOGE
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 55-63

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00292-020-00903-8

Keywords

Idiopathic organizing pneumonia; Masson bodies; Fibroblast proliferation; Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia; Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organizing pneumonia (OP) can be categorized into idiopathic (COP) and secondary forms, with the idiopathic form showing excellent response to corticosteroids. The course of secondary organizing pneumonia is dependent on the underlying diseases of the patients. Identifying accompanying histological characteristics is crucial in providing clues to the possible cause of OP.
Organizing pneumonia (OP) describes a histological pattern of acute or subacute lung damage. Clinically, patients present with cough, fever, and dyspnea. A distinction is made between idiopathic or cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) and secondary organizing pneumonia (OP). In COP, neither clinical/radiological nor histological causes can be determined. It is classified as an interstitial idiopathic pneumonia (IIP) according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Secondary organizing pneumonia has a known triggering mechanism, such as infectious agents, certain medications, or concomitant symptoms of other primary pulmonary diseases and diseases of other organ systems. Common to both forms is the histological picture of intra-alveolar mesenchymal buds. These are myofibroblast proliferates that branch out along the alveolar spaces. They are usually accompanied by a moderate interstitial and alveolar, chronic, and macrophage-rich inflammatory cell infiltrate. The most important differential diagnosis is common interstitial pneumonia (UIP). It also shows fibroblast proliferates, which are, however, located in the interstitium. The correct classification of an IIP as a COP by means of clinical, radiological, and histological findings is essential, since the COP, in contrast to the UIP, responds very well to corticosteroids and therefore has an excellent prognosis compared to the UIP. The course of secondary organizing pneumonia depends on the respective underlying disease. Here it is important for the pathologist to correctly identify potential accompanying histological characteristics in order to be able to provide clues to a possible cause of OP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available