4.7 Article

Chronology of Miocene terrestrial deposits and fossil vertebrates from Quebrada Honda (Bolivia)

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.110013

Keywords

Andes; Eastern Cordillera; 40Ar/39Ar; Quebrada Honda; Paleomagnetism; Serravallian

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [EAR 1423058, 0819817]
  2. National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration [NGS 8115-06]
  3. Catalan Government [2017-SGR-824]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [0819817] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

At similar to 3500 m above sea level in the Eastern Andean Cordillera, Quebrada Honda Basin exposes more than 300 m of middle Miocene sedimentary strata, developed on distal alluvial fan sediments interstratified with volcanoclastic deposits, overlying Paleozoic basement. These deposits are rich in exotic vertebrate fauna adapted to a wetter and warmer climate at lower paleoelevation, as contrasted with the present high-elevation cold and dry Andean conditions. This study provides new magnetostratigraphic and 40Ar/39Ar age control of the Quebrada Honda, Rio Rosario and Huayllajara fossiliferous areas, demonstrating that they are 13.1-12.4 Ma. Part of the succession evidences cyclical deposition of calcretes and reddish mudstones which may be a response to precessional orbital-forcing climatic processes. Paleomagnetic measurements show a significant clockwise tectonic rotation related to postdepositional tectonism, associated with evidence of an important uplift after the deposition of Quebrada Honda sediments. This uplift of the Andean Eastern Cordillera was associated with the formation of the Subandean fold-thrust belt and the development of the Amazon and La Plata drainage basins. Proposed uplift rates of > 200 m/Ma are compatible with well-established rates of uplift recorded in contemporaneous alpine sections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available