4.6 Article

Optimizing illumination in three-dimensional deconvolution microscopy for accurate refractive index tomography

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 6293-6301

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.412510

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Tomocube
  2. KAIST (Up program)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A3A2066550, 2017M3C1A3013923, 2018K000396]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In light transmission microscopy, axial scanning does not directly provide tomographic reconstruction of specimen. Phase deconvolution microscopy can convert a raw intensity image stack into a refractive index tomogram, the intrinsic sample contrast which can be exploited for quantitative morphological analysis. However, this technique is limited by reconstruction artifacts due to unoptimized optical conditions, which leads to a sparse and non-uniform optical transfer function. Here, we propose an optimization method based on simulated annealing to systematically obtain optimal illumination schemes that enable artifact-free deconvolution. The proposed method showed precise tomographic reconstruction of unlabeled biological samples.
In light transmission microscopy, axial scanning does not directly provide tomographic reconstruction of specimen. Phase deconvolution microscopy can convert a raw intensity image stack into a refractive index tomogram, the intrinsic sample contrast which can be exploited for quantitative morphological analysis. However, this technique is limited by reconstruction artifacts due to unoptimized optical conditions, which leads to a sparse and non-uniform optical transfer function. Here, we propose an optimization method based on simulated annealing to systematically obtain optimal illumination schemes that enable artifact-free deconvolution. The proposed method showed precise tomographic reconstruction of unlabeled biological samples. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available