4.6 Article

Two-wavelength phase-sensitive OTDR sensor using perfect periodic correlation codes for measurement range enhancement, noise reduction and fading compensation

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 6021-6035

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.413047

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion [PID2019-107270RB-C22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents a two-wavelength OTDR sensor using perfect periodic correlation phase codes to enhance measurement performance. While this technique increases measurement range, it also introduces relative measurement noise, which is addressed through optical pulse compression and other methods. Results show improved spatial resolution, strain sensitivity, and measurement range compared to conventional methods.
We demonstrate a two-wavelength differential-phase-measuring OTDR sensor that uses perfect periodic correlation phase codes to enhance the measurement performance. The two-wavelength technique extends the measurement range of OTDR sensors by synthesizing a virtual longer-wavelength measurement from two simultaneous measurements of phase using different lasers. This increases the range free from phase unwrapping errors. However, we find that the application of this technique greatly increases the relative measurement noise. To compensate for this issue, we introduce the use of optical pulse compression using perfect periodic correlation phase codes to increase the measurement signal-to-noise ratio and also to facilitate the simultaneous compensation of Rayleigh and polarization fading. In addition, we apply a method to further reduce the relative noise that is added to the two-wavelength measurement by using the synthetic wavelength measurement to unwrap the differential phase measured with a single wavelength. All this is highlighted in a 1-km sensing link in which up to 20-cm spatial resolution and 12.6 p epsilon/root Hz strain sensitivity are demonstrated as well as a 67-fold enhancement in measurement range compared with the use of the conventional single-wavelength method. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available