4.5 Article

Non-invasive cuff-less blood pressure estimation using a hybrid deep learning model

Journal

OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-020-02667-0

Keywords

Blood pressure (BP); Cuff-less; Photoplethysmogram (PPG); Electrocardiogram (ECG); Deep learning

Funding

  1. International Doctoral Innovation Centre
  2. Ningbo Education Bureau
  3. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau
  4. University of Nottingham
  5. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G037345/1, EP/L016362/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional blood pressure measurement methods have drawbacks, prompting the development of a hybrid deep learning model that utilizes both raw signals and physical characteristics for accurate BP measurement, achieving optimal results.
Conventional blood pressure (BP) measurement methods have different drawbacks such as being invasive, cuff-based or requiring manual operations. There is significant interest in the development of non-invasive, cuff-less and continual BP measurement based on physiological measurement. However, in these methods, extracting features from signals is challenging in the presence of noise or signal distortion. When using machine learning, errors in feature extraction result in errors in BP estimation, therefore, this study explores the use of raw signals as a direct input to a deep learning model. To enable comparison with the traditional machine learning models which use features from the photoplethysmogram and electrocardiogram, a hybrid deep learning model that utilises both raw signals and physical characteristics (age, height, weight and gender) is developed. This hybrid model performs best in terms of both diastolic BP (DBP) and systolic BP (SBP) with the mean absolute error being 3.23 +/- 4.75 mmHg and 4.43 +/- 6.09 mmHg respectively. DBP and SBP meet the Grade A and Grade B performance requirements of the British Hypertension Society respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available