4.6 Review

The Bidirectional Relationship between Vision and Cognition A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 7, Pages 981-992

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.010

Keywords

Bidirectional; Cognitive impairment; Dementia; Visual acuity; Visual impairment

Categories

Funding

  1. National Medical Research Council, Singapore, Republic of Singapore [NMRC/CSASI/0009/2016, MOH-TA19may-0002]
  2. Alzheimer's Association [AARF-18-565846]
  3. National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [K01AG062722]
  4. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health [EY029885]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed that individuals with visual impairment were more likely to have cognitive impairment, while those with cognitive impairment were more likely to have visual impairment. Factors such as age, sex, and follow-up duration partially explained the significant heterogeneity in the associations between visual impairment and cognitive impairment.
Topic: Visual impairment (VI) and cognitive impairment (CIM) are prevalent age-related conditions that impose substantial burden on the society. Findings on the hypothesized bidirectional association of VI and CIM remains equivocal. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this bidirectional relationship. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central registers were searched systematically for observational studies, published from inception until April 6, 2020, in adults 40 years of age or older reporting objectively measured VI and CIM assessment using clinically validated cognitive screening tests or diagnostic evaluation. Meta-analyses on cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between VI and CIM outcomes (any CIM assessed using screening tests and clinically diagnosed dementia) were examined. Random effect models were used to generate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also examined study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity. Results: Forty studies were included (n=47 913 570). Meta-analyses confirmed that persons with VI were more likely to have CIM, with significantly higher odds of: (1) any CIM (cross-sectional: OR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.84-3.07]; longitudinal: OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.46-1.89]) and (2) clinically diagnosed dementia (cross-sectional: OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.48-4.01]; longitudinal: OR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.37-3.21]) compared with persons without VI. Significant heterogeneity was explained partially by differences in age, sex, and follow-up duration. Also, some evidence suggested that individuals with CIM, relative to cognitively intact persons, were more likely to have VI, with most articles (8/9 [89%]) reporting significantly positive associations; however, meta-analyses on this association could not be conducted because of insufficient data. Discussion: Overall, our work suggests that VI is a risk factor of CIM, although further work is needed to confirm the association of CIM as a risk factor for VI. Strategies for early detection and management of both conditions in older peoplemay minimize individual clinical and public health consequences. (C) 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available