Journal
ONCOLOGIST
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 157-164Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/onco.13599
Keywords
Palliative care; Patient navigation; Advance directives; Symptom assessment; Health resources; Developing countries
Categories
Funding
- Global Cancer Institute
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Early integration of patient navigation in oncology can improve access to supportive care and advance care planning for patients with advanced cancer in resource-limited settings. This randomized controlled trial in Mexico City demonstrated that patient navigation interventions led to increased implementation of supportive care interventions, advance care planning, and decreased pain symptoms compared to usual oncologist-guided care. The results suggest that patient navigation may be a valuable solution for enhancing the implementation of supportive and palliative care in similar resource-limited settings worldwide.
Background The early integration of supportive care in oncology improves patient-centered outcomes. However, data are lacking regarding how to achieve this in resource-limited settings. We studied whether patient navigation increased access to multidisciplinary supportive care among Mexican patients with advanced cancer. Materials and Methods This randomized controlled trial was conducted between August 2017 and April 2018 at a public hospital in Mexico City. Patients aged >= 18 years with metastatic tumors <= 6 weeks from diagnosis were randomized (1:1) to a patient navigation intervention or usual care. Patients randomized to patient navigation received personalized supportive care from a navigator and a multidisciplinary team. Patients randomized to usual care obtained supportive care referrals from treating oncologists. The primary outcome was the implementation of supportive care interventions at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included advance directive completion, supportive care needs, and quality of life. Results One hundred thirty-four patients were randomized: 67 to patient navigation and 67 to usual care. Supportive care interventions were provided to 74% of patients in the patient navigation arm versus 24% in usual care (difference 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.62; p < .0001). In the patient navigation arm, 48% of eligible patients completed advance directives, compared with 0% in usual care (p < .0001). At 12 weeks, patients randomized to patient navigation had less moderate/severe pain (10% vs. 33%; difference 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.38; p = .006), without differences in quality of life between arms. Conclusion Patient navigation improves access to early supportive care, advance care planning, and pain for patients with advanced cancer in resource-limited settings. Implications for Practice The early implementation of supportive care in oncology is recommended by international guidelines, but this might be difficult to achieve in resource-limited settings. This randomized clinical trial including 134 Mexican patients with advanced cancer demonstrates that a multidisciplinary patient navigation intervention can improve the early access to supportive and palliative care interventions, increase advance care planning, and reduce symptoms compared with usual oncologist-guided care alone. These results demonstrate that patient navigation represents a potentially useful solution to achieve the adequate implementation of supportive and palliative care in resource-limited settings globally.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available