4.7 Article

Effects of extensible modelling on composite riser mechanical responses

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108426

Keywords

Composite risers; Cable dynamics; Time domain; Benchmarking

Funding

  1. EPSRC Centre of Doctoral Training grant [EP/L015382/1]
  2. Lloyd's Register Foundation [G0095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of transitioning from steel risers to composite materials on safety factors, uncovering uncertainties and changes in dynamic response, as well as the influence of extensibility on predicted results.
The change from steel risers to composites comes with uncertainties that led to large safety factors. One area of uncertainty is the predicted response and stresses derived from commercial packages that are based on formulations that assume in-extensible riser. However, composite pipes exhibit a lower axial stiffness and therefore the velocity of the axial waves will change with a corresponding change in dynamic response. To determine the effect of this assumption, this paper assesses the effect of extensibility on the time-domain response. It is found that the in-extensible model predicts 3 times the number of high frequency tension cycles in the 20 kN tension range. To determine the impact of this change on the stress, the accuracy of available composite pipe models is benchmarked using shell, continuum-shell and solid elements. The quadratic and continuum-shell elements provide a maximum percentage difference of 4% compared to solid elements but the continuum-shell is selected as it has a lower computational cost. The response from the extensible and in-extensible models are input into the pipe model, they provide similar Tsai-Wu failure factors, alleviating concerns when modelling the strength. However, the change in dynamics remains a concern for other applications such as machine-learning or digital-twins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available