4.7 Article

Wave power extraction analysis for an oscillating water column device with various surging lip-walls

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108483

Keywords

Marine energy; Oscillating water column; Energy extraction efficiency; Surging motion; Spring stiffness

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51879144, 51679124]
  2. State Key Laboratory of HydroScience and Engineering [2020-KY-02]
  3. Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the performance of extracting wave power from an offshore OWC device with different moving components. It is found that a deeper lip-wall draft is more beneficial for power extraction, and a medium chamber breadth is more desirable for a surging front lip-wall. Generally, a relatively smaller spring stiffness is recommended for the front-wall surging motion to make full use of the positive effects of the surging mode.
The performance in extracting wave power from an offshore OWC device with a surging front lip-wall and back lip-wall is explored and according to the potential flow theory, the matched eigenfunction method is employed to establish a theoretical model to solve the boundary value problem. Effects from the variation of symmetry lipwall drafts, chamber breadth, and spring stiffness, on the optimal extraction efficiency and other parameters of the OWC with different moving components are compared and discussed. It is found that a relatively deeper wall draft is more beneficial for the power extraction when equipped with a surging front lip-wall within the interested wave frequency range. To improve the trapped energy and reduce the occurring of sloshing mode inside the pneumatic chamber for a surging front lip-wall, a medium chamber breadth is more desirable as it can significantly enhance the peak efficiency as well as the expansion of high-efficiency frequency bandwidth, while a surging back lip-wall model is inferior in this aspect. In addition, generally a relatively smaller spring stiffness and even stiffness of zero is more recommended for the front-wall than the back-wall surging motion as the former can make full use the positive effects of the surging mode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available