4.4 Article

Differential effects of citalopram on the intake of high fat or high carbohydrates diets in female and male rats

Journal

NUTRITIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1477-1487

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1028415X.2020.1870198

Keywords

Citalopram; sex differences; serotonin; high-fat diet; high-carbohydrate diet; palatable diets

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chronic administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram affects food intake differently in female and male rats, depending on the type of macronutrients consumed.
Chronic administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), usually prescribed as antidepressants, decreases total energy intake; however, at present the differential effect on the intake of distinct macronutrients and on female vs. male organisms is not clear. On this basis, female and male adult Wistar rats were exposed to two types of diets: (1) a standard balanced diet (BD); or (2) two types of diets simultaneously, (a) one high in carbohydrates (HC); the other (b) high in fat (HF). Both study groups were given a dose of 10 mg/kg/day i.p. of citalopram or a vehicle for 21 days. Food and water consumption and body weight were recorded daily at baseline (BL), during treatment (TX), and post-treatment (PTx1-PTx2). The male rats exposed to BD reduced total energy consumption during treatment with citalopram, but body weight gain decreased both females and males compared to BL. During exposure to the two types of diets, citalopram treatment reduced fat consumption with respect to BL and PTx1 only in the male group. This group also decreased its total energy consumption during TX compared to PTx1. Finally, the females gained less body weight in TX than PTx1, while weight gain in the males during TX decreased with respect to BL and PTx1. Results show a differential effect of citalopram on females vs. males that was dependent on the type of macronutrient administered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available