4.6 Review

Dietary patterns and depression risk in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

NUTRITION REVIEWS
Volume 79, Issue 9, Pages 976-987

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa118

Keywords

depression; dietary pattern; meta-analysis; older adults; systematic review

Funding

  1. Kaohsiung Medical University Research Center [KMU-TC108B02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found an inverse association between healthy dietary patterns and depression risk in older adults, although there was high heterogeneity among the studies.
Context: Diet may be one of the modifiable environmental factors that could reduce depressive symptoms or abate the development of depression without side effects. However, previous reviews mainly focused on general adult populations. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the association between healthy dietary patterns and depression risk in older adults. Data Sources: Eight databases were searched up to September 2019. The inclusion criteria were older adults aged >= 65 years, healthy dietary patterns, depression assessed by a physician or by validated screening tools, and quantitative study design. Data Extraction: Data were extracted independently by 2 researchers, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline was followed. Data Analysis: Meta-analysis was conducted by calculating the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. A total of 18 eligible studies were metaanalyzed. Results showed that a healthy dietary pattern is associated with a reduced risk of depression in older adults (OR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.78-0.92; P < 0.001). There was high heterogeneity (I-2 = 64.9%; P < 0.001) among the studies. Subgroup analyses indicated that sample size and depression screening took were the main sources of study heterogeneity. Conclusions: An inverse association between healthy dietary patterns and depression risk in older adults was found. However, the high heterogeneity among the studies should be considered. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD 42020169195.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available