4.4 Article

A qualitative analysis of nursing students' tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 273-278

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12809

Keywords

COVID-19; nursing students; pandemics; social media; Twitter; mental health

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the tweets posted by nursing students in the UK, US, and South Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic, revealing their concerns about the impact of COVID-19, daily life, student role, social connections, and sociopolitical issues. The findings can help nurse educators better understand and incorporate students' responses to the pandemic into preparedness and response efforts.
The COVID-19 outbreak has profoundly changed daily life and the ways in which students learn and interact. This study explores the nature and content of tweets posted by students enrolled in nursing programs (hereafter nursing students) in the United Kingdom, the United States, and South Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 4 and April 7, 2020. A total of 8856 tweets from the Twitter accounts of 95 self-identified nursing students were included in our qualitative analysis. The findings revealed five categories of tweet content: (i) reactions to COVID-19; (ii) everyday life; (iii) role as a student; (iv) social connections; and (v) sociopolitical issues. Students shared concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on their education, discussed their experiences as nursing students, tweeted details of their daily lives, and sought social connections for support as well as for information sharing. The findings of this study can inform nurse educators to better understand their students' responses to and sentiments about the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurse educators should incorporate this understanding into curricula for pandemic preparedness and response efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available