4.3 Article

Telehealth Competencies for Nursing Education and Practice The Four P's of Telehealth

Journal

NURSE EDUCATOR
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 300-305

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000988

Keywords

advanced practice nursing; nurse practitioners; nursing education; telehealth competencies; telemedicine

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes the development of telehealth competencies for education and practice using the Four P's of Telehealth framework. A modified Delphi technique was used to identify, develop, and evaluate telehealth competencies. The competencies were aligned with telehealth domains, expected activities, and outcomes to guide curriculum development, practice, and future research.
Background: Telehealth is a rapidly growing health care delivery modality with advanced practice nurses as key providers. This growth has occurred without critical consideration of provider training. Training requires the development of competencies situated within a framework. Problem: Standardized telehealth competencies for advanced practice nursing are missing. The purpose of this article is to describe the development of telehealth competencies for education and practice. Approach: Using the Four P's of Telehealth framework (planning, preparing, providing, and performance evaluation), a modified Delphi technique was used to identify, develop, and evaluate telehealth competencies. Outcomes: Competencies were arranged around telehealth domains, expected activities, and outcomes. Effective use of the competencies to guide curriculum development, practice, and future research related to telehealth was identified. Conclusions: Providing education with competencies aligned to the Four P's Telehealth framework will provide learners with tools to assume leadership roles in all phases of telehealth implementation, delivery, and refinement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available