Journal
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A
Volume 1005, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121892
Keywords
Collective flow; Particle correlations and fluctuations
Categories
Funding
- CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient'ifico) [310141/20168, 205369/2018-9, 312932/2018-9]
- FAPEMIG (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais) [APQ-02107-16]
- FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo `a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) [2018/18075-0, 2018/24720-6, 2016/24029-6, 2017/05685-2]
- Instituto de Fisica-USP through CNPq
- Instituto de Fisica-USP through CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
- USP-COFECUB [Uc Ph 160-16, 2015/13]
- INCT-FNA [464898/2014-5]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This translation discusses a Principal Component Analysis conducted on a hydrodynamic simulation and compares it with experimental data from CMS. While the results for anisotropic flow are reasonable, they are qualitatively different for multiplicity fluctuations, possibly due to larger transverse momentum fluctuations and covariance in the simulation compared to experimental observations. This discrepancy could be related to excessive initial size fluctuations.
We present a Principal Component Analysis for a hydrodynamic simulation and compare with CMS experimental data. While the results are reasonable for anisotropic flow, for multiplicity fluctuations they are qualitatively different. We argue that this is due to too large transverse momentum (p(T)) fluctuations and N - p(T) covariance in the simulation than seen experimentally. In turn this is related to too large initial size fluctuations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available
Share Paper
