4.6 Review

Root effects on soil organic carbon: a double-edged sword

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 230, Issue 1, Pages 60-65

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.17082

Keywords

microbial turnover; nutrient and water uptake; mineral associated organic carbon; rhizodeposition; rhizosphere priming effect; soil aggregation

Categories

Funding

  1. Sydney Institute of Agriculture, University of Sydney, Nancy Roma Paech Visiting Professorship in Agriculture
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31988102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a paradoxical phenomenon where roots can both drive SOC stabilization leading to SOC accrual, and SOC destabilization causing SOC loss. The proposed Rhizo-Engine framework highlights the importance of considering both microbial turnover and the soil physicochemical matrix in understanding root-driven SOC dynamics. This framework aims to provide a more holistic approach to studying plant root effects on soil carbon sequestration and the sensitivity of SOC stocks to climate and land-use changes.
From recent developments on how roots affect soil organic carbon (SOC) an apparent paradox has emerged where roots drive SOC stabilization causing SOC accrual, but also SOC destabilization causing SOC loss. We synthesize current results and propose the new Rhizo-Engine framework consisting of two linked components: microbial turnover and the soil physicochemical matrix. The Rhizo-Engine is driven by rhizodeposition, root turnover, and plant uptake of nutrients and water, thereby accelerating SOC turnover through both stabilization and destabilization mechanisms. This Rhizo-Engine framework emphasizes the need for a more holistic approach to study root-driven SOC dynamics. This framework would provide better understanding of plant root effects on soil carbon sequestration and the sensitivity of SOC stocks to climate and land-use changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available