4.6 Article

Key root traits of Poaceae for adaptation to soil water gradients

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 229, Issue 6, Pages 3133-3140

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.17093

Keywords

aerenchyma; cortex; drought; flooding; root anatomical traits; stele; wild species; xylem

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency PRESTO [JPMJPR17Q8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drought and flooding present contrasting abiotic stressors for plants, with root anatomical traits playing a crucial role in adaptation. Research indicates that the ratio of root tissue areas can fully explain the adaptations of wild Poaceae species to soil water gradients. Three indices (CSR, XSR, and ACR) can determine the optimal anatomical traits for plant adaptation to soil water content.
Drought and flooding are contrasting abiotic stressors for plants. Evidence is accumulating for root anatomical traits being essential for the adaptation to drought or flooding. However, an integrated approach to comprehensively understand root anatomical traits has not yet been established. Here we analysed the root anatomical traits of 18 wild Poaceae species differing in adaptation to a range of soil water content. Regression model analyses revealed the optimal anatomical traits that were required by the plants to adapt to low or high soil water content. While the area and number of each root tissue (e.g. stele, cortex, xylem or aerenchyma) were not strongly correlated to the soil water content, the ratio of the root tissue areas (cortex to stele ratio (CSR), xylem to stele ratio (XSR) and aerenchyma to cortex ratio (ACR)) could fully explain the adaptations of the wild Poaceae species to the soil water gradients. Our results demonstrate that the optimal anatomical traits for the adaptations to soil water content can be determined by three indices (i.e. CSR, XSR and ACR), and thus we propose that these root anatomical indices can be used to improve the tolerance of crops to drought and flooding stresses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available