4.8 Article

A Randomized Trial of Convalescent Plasma in Covid-19 Severe Pneumonia

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 384, Issue 7, Pages 619-629

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031304

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
  2. Swiss Medical Group
  3. Hospital Universitario Austral
  4. Sanatorio Trinidad de Palermo
  5. Clinica Santa Isabel
  6. Hospital Privado de la Comunidad
  7. Hospital Zonal Ramon Carrillo de Bariloche
  8. Hospital JM Ramos Mejia
  9. Sanatorio Britanico de Rosario
  10. Hospital Privado de Cordoba
  11. Research Council of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
  12. National Council of Scientific Research and Technology (CONICET) Institute, National Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of Argentina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There were no significant differences observed in clinical status or overall mortality between patients treated with convalescent plasma and those who received placebo in the treatment of severe Covid-19 pneumonia. The study results indicate that both groups had similar clinical outcomes and mortality rates after 30 days.
BACKGROUND Convalescent plasma is frequently administered to patients with Covid-19 and has been reported, largely on the basis of observational data, to improve clinical outcomes. Minimal data are available from adequately powered randomized, controlled trials. METHODS We randomly assigned hospitalized adult patients with severe Covid-19 pneumonia in a 2:1 ratio to receive convalescent plasma or placebo. The primary outcome was the patient's clinical status 30 days after the intervention, as measured on a six-point ordinal scale ranging from total recovery to death. RESULTS A total of 228 patients were assigned to receive convalescent plasma and 105 to receive placebo. The median time from the onset of symptoms to enrollment in the trial was 8 days (interquartile range, 5 to 10), and hypoxemia was the most frequent severity criterion for enrollment. The infused convalescent plasma had a median titer of 1:3200 of total SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (interquartile range, 1:800 to 1:3200). No patients were lost to follow-up. At day 30 day, no significant difference was noted between the convalescent plasma group and the placebo group in the distribution of clinical outcomes according to the ordinal scale (odds ratio, 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 1.35; P = 0.46). Overall mortality was 10.96% in the convalescent plasma group and 11.43% in the placebo group, for a risk difference of -0.46 percentage points (95% CI, -7.8 to 6.8). Total SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers tended to be higher in the convalescent plasma group at day 2 after the intervention. Adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS No significant differences were observed in clinical status or overall mortality between patients treated with convalescent plasma and those who received placebo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available