4.8 Article

Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 384, Issue 9, Pages 795-807

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031994

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD
  2. NIAID
  3. National Cancer Institute, NIH [HHSN261200800001E 75N910D00024, 75N91019F00130/75N91020F00010]
  4. Department of Defense, Defense Health Program
  5. NIAID of the NIH [UM1AI148684, UM1AI148576, UM1AI148573, UM1AI148575, UM1AI148452, UM1AI148685, UM1AI148450, UM1AI148689]
  6. NIH Stimulating Access to Research in Residency grant [5R38AI140299-02]
  7. government of Japan
  8. government of Mexico
  9. government of Denmark
  10. government of Singapore
  11. Seoul National University Hospital
  12. United Kingdom Medical Research Council [MRC_UU_12023/23]
  13. MRC [MC_UU_12023/22] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combination treatment with baricitinib plus remdesivir was superior to remdesivir alone in reducing recovery time and accelerating improvement in clinical status among patients with Covid-19, notably among those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation. The combination was associated with fewer serious adverse events.
BACKGROUND Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with dysregulated inflammation. The effects of combination treatment with baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, plus remdesivir are not known. METHODS We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating baricitinib plus remdesivir in hospitalized adults with Covid-19. All the patients received remdesivir (<= 10 days) and either baricitinib (<= 14 days) or placebo (control). The primary outcome was the time to recovery. The key secondary outcome was clinical status at day 15. RESULTS A total of 1033 patients underwent randomization (with 515 assigned to combination treatment and 518 to control). Patients receiving baricitinib had a median time to recovery of 7 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6 to 8), as compared with 8 days (95% CI, 7 to 9) with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.32; P=0.03), and a 30% higher odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.6). Patients receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation at enrollment had a time to recovery of 10 days with combination treatment and 18 days with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.08). The 28-day mortality was 5.1% in the combination group and 7.8% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.09). Serious adverse events were less frequent in the combination group than in the control group (16.0% vs. 21.0%; difference, -5.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -9.8 to -0.3; P=0.03), as were new infections (5.9% vs. 11.2%; difference, -5.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.7 to -1.9; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS Baricitinib plus remdesivir was superior to remdesivir alone in reducing recovery time and accelerating improvement in clinical status among patients with Covid-19, notably among those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation. The combination was associated with fewer serious adverse events. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04401579.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available