4.5 Article

Do Food Odors Differently Influence Cerebral Activity Depending on Weight Status? An Electroencephalography Study of Implicit Olfactory Priming Effects on the Processing of Food Pictures

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 460, Issue -, Pages 130-144

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.01.015

Keywords

obesity; food; odor; priming; event-related potentials; EEG

Categories

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency [Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR): ImplicEAT project] [ANR-17-CE21-0001]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE21-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that weight status influences cerebral activity underlying the processing of food cues outside of consciousness, as early as the first detectable P100 peak.
automatic processes and cerebral activity may differ between individuals with different weight statuses in the presence of food stimuli (e.g. odors, pictures). In the present study, we used an implicit olfactory priming paradigm to test the influence of non-attentively perceived food odors on the cerebral activity underlying the processing of food pictures, in normal-weight, overweight, and obese adults. A pear odor and a pound cake odor were used as primes, respectively priming sweet low-energy-density foods and high-energydensity foods. Event-related potentials were recorded while the participants passively watched pictures of sweet low and high-energy-density foods, under the two priming conditions plus an odorless control condition. The amplitude and latency of several peaks were measured (P100, N100, P200, N400). As a major result, we found that weight status influences the cerebral activity underlying the processing of food cues outside of consciousness, as early as the first detectable P100 peak. ? 2021 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available