4.8 Article

Role of Aberrant Spontaneous Neurotransmission in SNAP25-Associated Encephalopathies

Journal

NEURON
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.012

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  3. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  4. NIH, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41GM103393]
  5. NIH [R01MH66198, R01AG055577, K99MH113764, R00MH113764, R01MH081060, R01MH070727, R37MH63105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown that mutations in the SNAP25 gene may cause developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, but the specific mechanisms are not yet clear. Research has found that mutations in SNAP25 can lead to related synaptic transmission phenotypes, but specific alterations in spontaneous neurotransmitter release are key factors in disease heterogeneity.
SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) complex, composed of synaptobrevin, syntaxin, and SNAP25, forms the essential fusion machinery for neurotransmitter release. Recent studies have reported several mutations in the gene encoding SNAP25 as a causative factor for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies of infancy and childhood with diverse clinical manifestations. However, it remains unclear how SNAP25 mutations give rise to these disorders. Here, we show that although structurally clustered mutations in SNAP25 give rise to related synaptic transmission phenotypes, specific alterations in spontaneous neurotransmitter release are a key factor to account for disease heterogeneity. Importantly, we identified a single mutation that augments spontaneous release without altering evoked release, suggesting that aberrant spontaneous release is sufficient to cause disease in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available