4.8 Article

Regional, Layer, and Cell-Type-Specific Connectivity of the Mouse Default Mode Network

Journal

NEURON
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.11.011

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01AG047589]
  2. European Research Council (ERC
  3. DISCONN) [802371]
  4. Simons Foundation [SFARI 400101]
  5. Brain and Behavior Foundation (2017 NARSAD, Independent Investigator Grant) [25861]
  6. NIH [1R21MH116473-01A1]
  7. Telethon Foundation [GGP19177]
  8. University of Padua inter-departmental project Proactive
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [802371] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research using mice models demonstrated the differences in projection patterns between layer 2/3 and layer 5 neurons within the DMN, further revealing the anatomical correlates of the DMN at different spatial scales.
The evolutionarily conserved default mode network (DMN) is a distributed set of brain regions coactivated during resting states that is vulnerable to brain disorders. How disease affects the DMN is unknown, but detailed anatomical descriptions could provide clues. Mice offer an opportunity to investigate structural connectivity of the DMN across spatial scales with cell-type resolution. We co-registered maps from functional magnetic resonance imaging and axonal tracing experiments into the 3D Allen mouse brain reference atlas. We find that the mouse DMN consists of preferentially interconnected cortical regions. As a population, DMN layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons project almost exclusively to other DMN regions, whereas L5 neurons project in and out of the DMN. In the retrosplenial cortex, a core DMN region, we identify two L5 projection types differentiated by in-or out-DMN targets, laminar position, and gene expression. These results provide a multi-scale description of the anatomical correlates of the mouse DMN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available