4.8 Article

Common fronto-temporal effective connectivity in humans and monkeys

Journal

NEURON
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.12.026

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT092606AIA]
  2. European Research Council Horizon 2020 (ERC CoG) [MECHIDENT 724198]
  3. National Institutes of Health [1S10OD02502501, R01 DC004290-20, U01 NS103780-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found comparable effective connectivity patterns between macaque monkeys and humans in brain pathways supporting language and memory, with human-specific differences in hemispheric lateralization effects. Additionally, rapid evoked potentials were observed between the auditory cortex and VLPFC in humans, indicating direct projections similar to those seen in monkeys.
yHuman brain pathways supporting language and declarative memory are thought to have differentiated substantially during evolution. However, cross-species comparisons are missing on site-specific effective connectivity between regions important for cognition. We harnessed functional imaging to visualize the effects of direct electrical brain stimulation in macaque monkeys and human neurosurgery patients. We discovered comparable effective connectivity between caudal auditory cortex and both ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC, including area 44) and parahippocampal cortex in both species. Human-specific differences were clearest in the form of stronger hemispheric lateralization effects. In humans, electrical tractography revealed remarkably rapid evoked potentials in VLPFC following auditory cortex stimulation and speech sounds drove VLPFC, consistent with prior evidence in monkeys of direct auditory cortex projections to homologous vocalization-responsive regions. The results identify a common effective connectivity signature in human and nonhuman primates, which from auditory cortex appears equally direct to VLPFC and indirect to the hippo campus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available