4.5 Article

Cyclophosphamide treatment in active multiple sclerosis

Journal

NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 3775-3780

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05052-1

Keywords

Active multiple sclerosis; Cyclophosphamide; Efficacy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective analysis of cyclophosphamide (CYC) treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) shows that it remains a valid therapeutic option, especially for patients with high relapsing activity and malignant disease course. The efficacy of CYC is demonstrated through stable EDSS scores, decreased progression index (PI), and reduced annualized relapse rate (ARR) over a 36-month follow-up period.
Objective Cyclophosphamide (CYC) is an alkylating agent with immunosuppressive effect by inhibiting DNA synthesis and producing apoptosis used in many autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we analyze the efficacy of CYC treatment in relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and active secondary progressive MS (SPMS) in our center with a monthly scheme. Methods Patients with MS treated with CYC and a follow up of at least 36 months were eligible for inclusion. All participants had received a standard CYC regimen. The EDSS score mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) and progression index (PI) were measured as efficacy outcomes at 12, 24, and 36 months. Outcomes were also analyzed comparing disease course and activity. Results A total of 16 patients were included (50% male, 18.75% RRMS and 81.25% SPMS). EDSS remained stable along the follow-up period, with 62.5% improving or maintaining the same EDSS score at 12 months. PI decreased 14% and 21% at 12 and 24-36 months of follow-up, respectively. ARR decreased 20% after 12 months, 19% after 24 months, and 30.23% after 36 months. Median differences in ARR were higher in patients with high relapse activity (0.60 vs 0.07, p = 0.001) and malignant course (0.60 vs 0.17, p = 0.027). PI also differed with higher mean differences in patients with high relapse activity (0.70 vs 0.03, p = 0.016) and malignant course (1.17 vs 0.03, p = 0.003). Conclusions CYC continues to be a valid therapeutic option, especially in regions with limited access to high-efficiency therapies particularly in patients with high relapsing activity and malignant course.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available