4.6 Article

Whole-brain radiotherapy with and without concurrent erlotinib in NSCLC with brain metastases: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 967-978

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa281

Keywords

brain metastases; epidermal growth factor receptor; erlotinib; non-small cell lung cancer; whole-brain radiation therapy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972851, 81472803]
  2. Foundation and Frontier Research Project of Chongqing [cstc2015jcyjBX0084]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the efficacy of concurrent erlotinib with whole-brain radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with brain metastases. The findings indicated that the combination therapy did not significantly improve intracranial progression-free survival and did not lead to significant cognitive function impairment.
Background. Erlotinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) demonstrated a favorable objective response rate in a phase II single-arm trial of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. We assessed whether concurrent erlotinib with WBRT is safe and benefits patients in a phase III, randomized trial. Methods. NSCLC patients with two or more brain metastases were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to WBRT (n = 115) or WBRT combined with erlotinib arms (n = 109). The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and cognitive function (CF) was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results. A total of 224 patients from 10 centers across China were randomized to treatments. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. Median iPFS for WBRT concurrent erlotinib was 11.2 months vs 9.2 months for WBRT-alone (P = .601). Median PFS and overall survival (OS) of combination group were 5.3 vs 4.0 months (P = .825) and 12.9 vs 10.0 months (P = .545), respectively, compared with WBRT-alone. In EGFR-mutant patients, iPFS (14.6 vs 12.8 months; P = .164), PFS (8.8 vs 6.4 months; P = .702), and OS (17.5 vs 16.9 months; P = .221) were not significantly improved in combination group over WBRT-alone. Moreover, there were no significant differences in patients experiencing MMSE score change between the treatments. Conclusion. Concurrent erlotinib with WBRT didn't improve iPFS and excessive CF detriment either in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population or in EGFR-mutant patients compared with WBRT-alone, suggesting that while safe for patients already taking the drug, there is no justification for adding concurrent EGFR-TKI with WBRT for the treatment of brain metastases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available