4.6 Article

High spatial resolution remote sensing image segmentation based on the multiclassification model and the binary classification model

Journal

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 3597-3604

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05561-8

Keywords

High spatial resolution remote sensing image; Semantic segmentation; U-Net; Neighborhood voting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semantic segmentation technology is crucial for interpreting remote sensing images. Traditional methods cannot accurately segment high spatial resolution images. This paper explores the use of U-Net algorithm in remote sensing image classification and segmentation, achieving high accuracy and credibility through a neighborhood voting method for uncertain pixels.
Semantic segmentation technology is an important step in the interpretation of remote sensing images. High spatial resolution remote sensing images have clear features. Traditional image segmentation methods cannot fully represent the information in high spatial resolution images and tend to yield unsatisfactory segmentation accuracy. With the rapid development of deep learning, many researchers have tried to use deep learning algorithms for remote sensing image segmentation. This paper uses U-Net for multiclassification and binary classification of Gaofen-2 high spatial resolution remote sensing image data. Six types of features, which were build-up, farmland, water, meadow, forest and others, were labeled in the image. A neighborhood voting method was used to determine the category of uncertain pixels based on spatial heterogeneity and homogeneity. Through U-Net neural network multiclassification, the overall accuracy of the training data is 93.83%; the overall accuracy of the test data is 82.27%; and the test accuracy of the binary classification algorithm is 79.75%. The results show that the two models yield high accuracy and credibility in remote sensing image segmentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available