4.5 Article

Stepwise gating of the Sec61 protein-conducting channel by Sec63 and Sec62

Journal

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 162-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-020-00541-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Vallee Scholars Program
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM123169]
  3. National Science Foundation [TG-MCB130173, ACI-1548562]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cryo-EM structures of fungal Sec61-Sec62-Sec63 complexes reveal the hierarchical activation of the Sec61 channel by Sec62 and Sec63, facilitating post-translational protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum.
Cryo-EM structures of fungal Sec61-Sec62-Sec63 complexes show how Sec63 and Sec62 work together in a hierarchical manner to activate the Sec61 channel for protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. Many proteins are transported into the endoplasmic reticulum by the universally conserved Sec61 channel. Post-translational transport requires two additional proteins, Sec62 and Sec63, but their functions are poorly defined. In the present study, we determined cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of several variants of Sec61-Sec62-Sec63 complexes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Thermomyces lanuginosus and show that Sec62 and Sec63 induce opening of the Sec61 channel. Without Sec62, the translocation pore of Sec61 remains closed by the plug domain, rendering the channel inactive. We further show that the lateral gate of Sec61 must first be partially opened by interactions between Sec61 and Sec63 in cytosolic and luminal domains, a simultaneous disruption of which completely closes the channel. The structures and molecular dynamics simulations suggest that Sec62 may also prevent lipids from invading the channel through the open lateral gate. Our study shows how Sec63 and Sec62 work together in a hierarchical manner to activate Sec61 for post-translational protein translocation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available