4.7 Article

Strong inhibitory signaling underlies stable temporal dynamics and working memory in spiking neural networks

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 129-139

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-00753-w

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [F30MH115605-01A1]
  2. NVIDIA Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing computational models and neural data, the authors demonstrate that inhibitory-to-inhibitory signaling is crucial for maintaining stable temporal dynamics and working memory in the primate prefrontal cortex.
By analyzing computational models and neural data from the primate prefrontal cortex, the authors show that inhibitory-to-inhibitory signaling is critical for the stable temporal dynamics required for performing working memory tasks. Cortical neurons process information on multiple timescales, and areas important for working memory (WM) contain neurons capable of integrating information over a long timescale. However, the underlying mechanisms for the emergence of neuronal timescales stable enough to support WM are unclear. By analyzing a spiking recurrent neural network model trained on a WM task and activity of single neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex, we show that the temporal properties of our model and the neural data are remarkably similar. Dissecting our recurrent neural network model revealed strong inhibitory-to-inhibitory connections underlying a disinhibitory microcircuit as a critical component for long neuronal timescales and WM maintenance. We also found that enhancing inhibitory-to-inhibitory connections led to more stable temporal dynamics and improved task performance. Finally, we show that a network with such microcircuitry can perform other tasks without disrupting its pre-existing timescale architecture, suggesting that strong inhibitory signaling underlies a flexible WM network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available