4.7 Article

Overexpression of schizophrenia susceptibility factor human complement C4A promotes excessive synaptic loss and behavioral changes in mice

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 214-224

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-00763-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [P50MH112491-01, AR072965]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overexpression of complement C4A is associated with schizophrenia risk. Investigation using a novel mouse model showed that increased expression of C4A leads to abnormal synaptic pruning and behavior, suggesting its importance as a therapeutic target.
Overexpression of complement C4A is associated with schizophrenia risk. Using a novel mouse model, Yilmaz et al. find that increased expression of C4A leads to abnormal synaptic pruning and behavior, suggesting its importance as a therapeutic target. The complement component 4 (C4) gene is linked to schizophrenia and synaptic refinement. In humans, greater expression of C4A in the brain is associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia. To investigate this genetic finding and address how C4A shapes brain circuits in vivo, here, we generated a mouse model with primate-lineage-specific isoforms of C4, human C4A and/or C4B. Human C4A bound synapses more efficiently than C4B. C4A (but not C4B) rescued the visual system synaptic refinement deficits of C4 knockout mice. Intriguingly, mice without C4 had normal numbers of cortical synapses, which suggests that complement is not required for normal developmental synaptic pruning. However, overexpressing C4A in mice reduced cortical synapse density, increased microglial engulfment of synapses and altered mouse behavior. These results suggest that increased C4A-mediated synaptic elimination results in abnormal brain circuits and behavior. Understanding pathological overpruning mechanisms has important therapeutic implications in disease conditions such as schizophrenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available