4.8 Article

diaPASEF: parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation combined with data-independent acquisition

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 1229-+

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-00998-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG-Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Prize) [MA 1764/2-1]
  2. Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science
  3. Government of Canada through Genome Canada [15411]
  4. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione grant [PZ00P3_161435]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-688 107679]
  7. European Research Council [ERC-20140AdG 670821]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

diaPASEF makes use of the correlation between the ion mobility and the m/z of peptides to trap and release precursor ions in a TIMS-TOF mass spectrometer for an almost complete sampling of the precursor ion beam with data-independent acquisition. Data-independent acquisition modes isolate and concurrently fragment populations of different precursors by cycling through segments of a predefined precursor m/z range. Although these selection windows collectively cover the entire m/z range, overall, only a few per cent of all incoming ions are isolated for mass analysis. Here, we make use of the correlation of molecular weight and ion mobility in a trapped ion mobility device (timsTOF Pro) to devise a scan mode that samples up to 100% of the peptide precursor ion current in m/z and mobility windows. We extend an established targeted data extraction workflow by inclusion of the ion mobility dimension for both signal extraction and scoring and thereby increase the specificity for precursor identification. Data acquired from whole proteome digests and mixed organism samples demonstrate deep proteome coverage and a high degree of reproducibility as well as quantitative accuracy, even from 10 ng sample amounts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available