4.8 Article

High-accuracy long-read amplicon sequences using unique molecular identifiers with Nanopore or PacBio sequencing

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 165-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-01041-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VILLUM FONDEN [15510]
  2. Poul Due Jensen Foundation (Microflora Danica)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Genome British Columbia [SIP011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-throughput amplicon sequencing of large genomic regions remains challenging for short-read technologies. Here, a new approach combining unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) or Pacific Biosciences circular consensus sequencing was reported, achieving high-accuracy single-molecule consensus sequences. The method was successfully applied to sequence ribosomal RNA operon amplicons and genomic sequences of microbial communities, showing a very low chimera rate.
High-throughput amplicon sequencing of large genomic regions remains challenging for short-read technologies. Here, we report a high-throughput amplicon sequencing approach combining unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) or Pacific Biosciences circular consensus sequencing, yielding high-accuracy single-molecule consensus sequences of large genomic regions. We applied our approach to sequence ribosomal RNA operon amplicons (similar to 4,500 bp) and genomic sequences (>10,000 bp) of reference microbial communities in which we observed a chimera rate <0.02%. To reach a mean UMI consensus error rate <0.01%, a UMI read coverage of 15x (ONT R10.3), 25x (ONT R9.4.1) and 3x (Pacific Biosciences circular consensus sequencing) is needed, which provides a mean error rate of 0.0042%, 0.0041% and 0.0007%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available