4.8 Article

Improving the trans-ancestry portability of polygenic risk scores by prioritizing variants in predicted cell-type-specific regulatory elements

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 52, Issue 12, Pages 1346-1354

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-00740-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. NHGRI [T32 HG002295, UH2AR067677, 1U01HG009088, U01 HG009379, 1R01AR063759]
  3. MRC [MR/R013926/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poor trans-ancestry portability of polygenic risk scores is a consequence of Eurocentric genetic studies and limited knowledge of shared causal variants. Leveraging regulatory annotations may improve portability by prioritizing functional over tagging variants. We constructed a resource of 707 cell-type-specific IMPACT regulatory annotations by aggregating 5,345 epigenetic datasets to predict binding patterns of 142 transcription factors across 245 cell types. We then partitioned the common SNP heritability of 111 genome-wide association study summary statistics of European (average n approximate to 189,000) and East Asian (average n approximate to 157,000) origin. IMPACT annotations captured consistent SNP heritability between populations, suggesting prioritization of shared functional variants. Variant prioritization using IMPACT resulted in increased trans-ancestry portability of polygenic risk scores from Europeans to East Asians across all 21 phenotypes analyzed (49.9% mean relative increase in R-2). Our study identifies a crucial role for functional annotations such as IMPACT to improve the trans-ancestry portability of genetic data. A resource of cell-type-specific IMPACT regulatory annotations improves the trans-ancestry portability of polygenic risk scores by prioritizing variants enriched for trait heritability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available