4.8 Article

Discovery of rare variants associated with blood pressure regulation through meta-analysis of 1.3 million individuals

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 52, Issue 12, Pages 1314-1332

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-00713-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Rutherford Fund Fellowship from the Medical Research Council [MR/S003746/1]
  2. Foundation De Drie Lichten' in the Netherlands
  3. Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative
  4. Dutch Heart Foundation [CVON2012-10 PREDICT, CVON2018-30 PREDICT2]
  5. BHF Programme Grant [RG/18/13/33946]
  6. Vanderbilt Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer (MAGEC) Training Program [T32CA160056]
  7. National Institute of Health [HL140385, MD012765, DK117445]
  8. Isaac Newton Trust/Wellcome Trust ISSF/University of Cambridge Joint Research Grants Scheme - Medical Research Council-Newton Project
  9. UCL Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  10. British Heart Foundation (BHF) [RG/14/5/30893, R01DK110113, U01HG007417, R01DK101855, R01DK107786]
  11. MRC University Unit Programme [MC_UU_00007/10, MC_PC_U127592696, 098381, 212259, NF-SI-0617-10090]
  12. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
  13. Wellcome Trust [098381, 212259, 090532, 106130, 203141]
  14. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre in Oxford
  15. H2020 DynaHEALTH action [633595]
  16. EU [643774]
  17. British Heart Foundation Research Excellence Award [RE/18/6/34217]
  18. UKRI Innovation Fellowship at Health Data Research UK
  19. NIH [R01-DK117445, R01-MD012765, R21-HL140385]
  20. Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol
  21. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_00011/1]
  22. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQS)
  23. BHF [PG/17/35/33001, PG/19/16/34270]
  24. Kidney Research UK [RP_017_20180302]
  25. Evans Medical Foundation
  26. Jay and Louis Coffman Endowment from the Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine
  27. National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator Award
  28. Li Ka Shing Foundation
  29. WT-SSI/John Fell funds
  30. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  31. National Institutes of Health [5P50HD028138-27]
  32. NIHR (Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
  33. British Heart Foundation [PG/19/16/34270, PG/17/35/33001] Funding Source: researchfish
  34. Kidney Research UK [RP_017_20180302, RP_013_20190305] Funding Source: researchfish
  35. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_00011/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  36. MRC [G9521010, MR/L003120/1, MC_UU_00007/10, MC_PC_U127592696, MC_UU_00011/4, MR/S004068/2, MC_UU_12015/1, MC_UU_00026/3, MR/R023484/1, MR/S003746/1, MC_UU_12013/2, G0800270, MR/S004068/1, MC_UU_00011/5, MC_UU_00011/1, MC_UU_00002/7, MC_UU_00006/1, MC_PC_MR/R020183/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic studies of blood pressure (BP) to date have mainly analyzed common variants (minor allele frequency > 0.05). In a meta-analysis of up to similar to 1.3 million participants, we discovered 106 new BP-associated genomic regions and 87 rare (minor allele frequency <= 0.01) variant BP associations (P < 5 x 10(-8)), of which 32 were in new BP-associated loci and 55 were independent BP-associated single-nucleotide variants within known BP-associated regions. Average effects of rare variants (44% coding) were similar to 8 times larger than common variant effects and indicate potential candidate causal genes at new and known loci (for example, GATA5 and PLCB3). BP-associated variants (including rare and common) were enriched in regions of active chromatin in fetal tissues, potentially linking fetal development with BP regulation in later life. Multivariable Mendelian randomization suggested possible inverse effects of elevated systolic and diastolic BP on large artery stroke. Our study demonstrates the utility of rare-variant analyses for identifying candidate genes and the results highlight potential therapeutic targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available