4.8 Article

Integrated molecular drivers coordinate biological and clinical states in melanoma

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 52, Issue 12, Pages 1373-1383

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-00739-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [F31CA239347]
  2. National Institutes of Health [5T32HG002295-15, R01CA227388-02, R21CA242861]
  3. Damon Runyon Clinical Investigator Award
  4. Claudia Adams Barr Program for Innovative Cancer Research
  5. AWS Cloud Credits for Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We performed harmonized molecular and clinical analysis on 1,048 melanomas and discovered markedly different global genomic properties among subtypes (BRAF, (N)RAS, NF1, triple wild-type (TWT)), subtype-specific preferences for secondary driver genes and active mutational processes previously unreported in melanoma. Secondary driver genes significantly enriched in specific subtypes reflected preferential dysregulation of additional pathways, such as induction of transforming growth factor-beta signaling in BRAF melanomas and inactivation of the SWI/SNF complex in (N)RAS melanomas, and select co-mutation patterns coordinated selective response to immune checkpoint blockade. We also defined the mutational landscape of TWT melanomas and revealed enrichment of DNA-repair-defect signatures in this subtype, which were associated with transcriptional downregulation of key DNA-repair genes, and may revive previously discarded or currently unconsidered therapeutic modalities for genomically stratified melanoma patient subsets. Broadly, harmonized meta-analysis of melanoma whole exomes revealed distinct molecular drivers that may point to multiple opportunities for biological and therapeutic investigation. Harmonized analysis of 1,048 melanomas shows different global genomic properties among subtypes and identifies subtype-specific enrichment for secondary driver genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available